765 N.E.2d 878Supreme Court of Ohio.
2002.
APPEALS NOT ALLOWED FOR REVIEW
Announcements April 4, 200202-102. Physicians Ins. Co. of Ohio v. Univ. of Cincinnati Hosp.Aring Neurological Inst.
Franklin App. No. 01AP-373.
Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
02-128. Connors v. Bridgestone Tire Rubber Co.
Cuyahoga App. No. 79645.
Douglas, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
02-153. Armstrong v. Best Buy Co.
Lorain App. No. 01CA007848.
Douglas and Cook, JJ., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I.
F.E. Sweeney, J., would allow.
02-161. Kinney v. Kroger Co.
Franklin App. No. 01AP-443.
F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
02-186. In re Jones.
Franklin App. No. 01AP-376.
Page 1412
Moyer, C.J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I.
Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., would allow.
02-291. Pillo v. Stricklin.
Stark App. No. 2001CA00204.
Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent, would allow the appeal, and would hold this cause for the decision in 01-1709, Kemper v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., Certified Question of State Law, No. 9300CV07799.