CALVERT v. DEPT. OF REHAB., Unpublished Decision (11-6-2006)

2006-Ohio-6469

DONALD CALVERT, Plaintiff v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION, Defendant.

No. 2005-04128.Court of Claims of Ohio.
November 6, 2006.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Richard F. Swope, Reynoldsburg, Attorney for Plaintiff.

Jana M. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, Columbus, Peggy W. Corn Assistant Attorney General Constitutional Offices Section, Columbus, Attorneys for Defendant.

Judge JOSEPH T. CLARK, Magistrate STEVEN A. LARSON.

JOSEPH T. CLARK, Judge.

JUDGMENT ENTRY

{ ¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On July 19, 2006, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{ ¶ 2} Civ.R. 53(E)(3)(a) states: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, regardless of whether the court has adopted the decision pursuant to Civ.R. 53(E)(4)(c). * * *” Plaintiff has not filed an objection.

{ ¶ 3} Upon review, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.