2006-Ohio-3862, 852 N.E.2d 184
2006-0985.Supreme Court of Ohio.
August 2, 2006.
In Mandamus. On answer of respondent and relator’s motion for leave to amend complaint pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. VIII(7) and Civ.R. 15(A). On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. Motion for leave to amend denied as moot.
Page 1434
MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.