667 N.E.2d 22-29Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSIALS Friday, July 12, 1996 96-862. State ex rel. Rice v. O’Grady. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. It appears from the records of this court that relator has not filed his brief which was due no later than June 28, 1996, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, sua sponte.
96-1081. Schoen v. Giles. Licking County, No. 95-104. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and as a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of the application for dismissal of appeal of appellant, the Midwestern Indemnity Company,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal of appeal of appellant, the Midwestern Indemnity Company be, and hereby is, granted.
The appeal of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company remains pending.
96-1290. State v. Ayala. Franklin County, Nos. 95APA02-145 and 95APA02-165. This cause is pending before the court as a claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.