BARCROFT v. PAUL WINSTON CO., 172 Ohio St. 487 (1961)

178 N.E.2d 598

BARCROFT, D.B.A. BARCROFT ADVERTISING AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. PAUL WINSTON CO. ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 37222Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided November 15, 1961.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Sale of summer theatrical production business — Bulk Sales Law — Applicability.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.

Mr. Emanuel Nadlin, for appellants.

Messrs. Harshman, Young, Colvin Alexander and Mr. George Ruble, for appellees.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

ZIMMERMAN, acting C.J., RADCLIFF, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and O’NEILL, JJ., concur.

ZIMMERMAN, J., sitting in the place and stead of WEYGANDT, C.J.

RADCLIFF, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of ZIMMERMAN, J.