2009-Ohio-6700
No. 2009-1960.Supreme Court of Ohio.
December 21, 2009.
Disciplinary Cases.
This cause is pending before the court upon the filing of a report and recommendation by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. On December 1, 2009, relator, Akron Bar Association, filed a suggestion of death of respondent. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that this matter is dismissed.
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS
In re Report of the Commission : On Continuing Legal Education. : Case No. CLE-2007-75411 Carlos Francisco Martin : ORDER (# 0075411), : Respondent. :
Page 1529
This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (“commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(1)(b) and (A)(2)(c). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 2005-2006 reporting period.
On June 16, 2008, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imoosed a sanction fee upon respondent, and suspended respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3) and (5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7), respondent complies with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, respondent complies with this and all other orders of the court, and this court orders respondent reinstated.
On December 14, 2009, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies, and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X and recommending that respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. The commission certified that responden; had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during the suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Respondent has satisfied all the requirements of this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,
It is ordered by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adoptsd and respondent, Carlos Francisco Martin, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.