2011-Ohio-4776, 953 N.E.2d 845
No. 2009-1542.Supreme Court of Ohio.
September 22, 2011.
Disciplinary Case
This cause came on for further consideration upon the August 15, 2011 filing by relator of a motion to enforce the court’s order and to impose sanctions. On September 2, 2011, respondent filed a motion to strike the motion to impose sanctions, or alternatively, remand to the board.
Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that relator’s motion to enforce the court’s order is granted in part, relator’s motion to impose sanctions is denied, and respondent’s motion to strike, or in the alternative, the motion to remand, is denied in part and granted in part. This matter is hereby remanded to the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline for a hearing on whether respondent has complied with this court’s order requiring an audit of respondent’s IOLTA account and to resolve any issues regarding the proper scope of said audit.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…