APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW, 99 Ohio St.3d 1510 (2003)


2003-Ohio-3957, 792 N.E.2d 198Supreme Court of Ohio.
2003.

APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW2003-0729. Sekula v. Hartford Ins. Co.
Cuyahoga App. No. 81295, 2003-Ohio-1160. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause held for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-Ohio-1502, and 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265,2002-Ohio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

2003-0765. State v. Chandler.

Hamilton App. No. C-020253. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause consolidated with 2003-0766,

Page 1511

State v. Tate, Hamilton App. No. C-020188.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

2003-0766. State v. Tate.

Hamilton App. No. C-020188. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause consolidated with 2003-0765, State v. Chandler, Hamilton App. No. C-020253.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

2003-0778. Musser v. Musser.

Adams App. No. 02CA750, 2003-Ohio-1440. Discretionary appeal allowed, cause consolidated with 2003-0780, Musser v. Musser, Adams App. No. 02CA750, 2003-Ohio-1440, causes held for the decision in 2002-1956, Tucker v. Wilson, Clermont App. No. CA2002-01-002, 2002-Ohio-5142, and briefing schedule stayed.

2003-0794. Heath v. Fid. Cas. Co. of New York.

Summit App. No. 21221, 2003-Ohio-1303. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-Ohio-1502.

O’Donnell, J., concurs.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow Propositions of Law Nos. III through VIII and hold for the decision in Galatis.

O’Connor, J., concurs in part, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I only, and would hold the cause for the decision in 2002-1956, Tucker v. Wilson, Clermont App. No. CA2002-01-002,2002-Ohio-5142.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal denied.

Moyer, C.J., concurs in part, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I, and would hold the cross-appeal for the decision i Tucker.

Pfeifer, J., dissents and would allow the cross-appeal.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents, would allow the cross-appeal, and would hold the cross-appeal for the decision i Galatis.

2003-0814. Rucker v. Everen Securities, Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 81540, 2003-Ohio-1166.

F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

2003-0820. State v. Miller.

Cuyahoga App. No. 81608, 2003-Ohio-1168. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause held for the decision in 2002-1888, State v. Jordan, Cuyahoga App. No. 80675, 2002-Ohio-4587; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, J., concurs but would not hold for State v. Jordan.

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

2003-0827. Akron Gen. Med. Ctr. v. James.

Holmes App. No. 2002CA009. Discretionary appeal allowed and cause consolidated with 2003-0867, Akron Gen. Med. Ctr. v. James, Holmes App. No. 2002CA009.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Donnell, J., would allow but would hold the causes for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-Ohio-903.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow but would hold the causes for the decision in Burkhart and 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-Ohio-1502.

O’Connor, J., would allow but would hold the causes for the decision in Galatis.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary cross-appeal denied.

2003-0840. Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co.

Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02-40, 2003-Ohio-1574. Discretionary appeal allowed, cause consolidated with 2003-0981 Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co., Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02-40, 2003-Ohio-1574, causes held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark

Page 1512

App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-Ohio-903, and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur.

Pfeifer, J., concurs but would also hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784,2002-Ohio-1502.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs but would not hold for the decision in Burkhart.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in part, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I and hold for Burkhart, and would allow on Proposition of Law No. III and hold for Galatis.

O’Connor, J., concurs in part and would allow on Proposition of Law No. I only and hold for Burkhart.

Resnick, J., dissents.

2003-0844. Taylor v. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 01AP-922, 2003-Ohio-1446. Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II.

Moyer, C.J., and O’Connor, J., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-Ohio-1502.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., concur and would hold for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-Ohio-903.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

2003-0871. Kudukis v. Mascinskas.

Cuyahoga App. No. 81663, 2003-Ohio-1355.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

2003-0872. Stout v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 02AP-628, 152 Ohio App.3d 355, 2003-Ohio-1643. Discretionary appeal allowed, cause consolidated with 2003-0983 Stout v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., Franklin App. No. 02AP-628, 152 Ohio App.3d 355, 2003-Ohio-1643, causes held for the decision in 2020-1956, Tucker v. Wilson, Clermont App. No. CA2002-01-002, 2002-Ohio-5142, and briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

2003-0878. Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-Ohio-1708. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only, cause consolidated with 2003-1018, Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., Ross App. No. 02CA2653,2003-Ohio-1708, causes held for the decision in 2003-0474, Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-02-1166, 2003-Ohio-488, and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.