APPEALS NOT ALLOWED FOR REVIEWSupreme Court of Ohio.
March 19, 2002
01-2270. Neudecker v. Butler Cty. Engineer’s Office.
Butler App. No. CA2000-07-0147.
Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
02-9. Leisure v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
Stark App. No. 2001CA00095.
Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
02-34. Trumbull S. L. Co. v. Vaccar.
Trumbull App. No. 2000-T-0101.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.
02-77. State v. Wright.
Washington App. No. 00CA39.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Cook, JJ., dissent.
02-96. State v. Noser.
Lucas App. No. L-00-1154.
Lundberg Stratton, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. I.
Moyer, C.J., would allow on Proposition of Law Nos. I and V.
F.E. Sweeney, J., would allow all propositions of law.
02-271. In re Fennell.
Athens App. No. 01CA45.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.