ARMSTRONG v. BETTMAN., 124 Ohio St. 650 (1931)

181 N.E. 885

ARMSTRONG ET AL. v. BETTMAN, ATTY. GENL., ET AL.

No. 22945Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 10, 1931.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Gilbert Bettman, attorney general, Mr. Oscar Brown, Messrs. Griswold, Green, Palmer Hadden and Mr. Wilbur E. Benoy, for defendants in error.

Mr. Edwin S. Wertz, Mr. Joseph C. Breitenstein, and Mr. W. Howard Ross, for cross-petitioner Liechti.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN and KINKADE, JJ., concur.