BALDWIN ET AL. v. LINT, 132 Ohio St. 20 (1936)

4 N.E.2d 399

BALDWIN ET AL., APPELLEES v. LINT ET AL., APPELLANTS.

No. 26089Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 14, 1936.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Jurisdiction of Court of Appeals — Section 6, Article IV, Constitution — Final order — Overruling motion to vacate summary judgment and for new trial — Omission of indispensable party deprived court of jurisdiction.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Lucas county.

Mr. Edward Lamb, for appellees.

Messrs. Smith, Baker, Effler Eastman, Messrs. Welles, Kelsey Cobourn, Messrs. Marshall, Melhorn Marlar an Messrs. Doyle Lewis, for appellants.

It is ordered and adjudged that said appeal as of right be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Page 21