BARNES v. CLEVELAND, 119 Ohio St.3d 1428 (2008)


2008-Ohio-4288

State ex rel. Barnes v. Cleveland.

No. 2008-0289.Supreme Court of Ohio.
August 25, 2008.

In Mandamus.

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint and respondents’ motions for a more definite statement and to strike the amended complaint,

It is ordered by the court that relator’s motion for leave is denied and respondents’ motions are denied as moot.

ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
1. A proposed “Consumer’s Practical Guide to Managing a Relationship with a Lawyer” has been published for public comment.

Page 1429