BARNETT v. YOUNG, BUREAU WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION, 171 Ohio St. 557 (1961)


173 N.E.2d 102

BARNETT, APPELLEE v. YOUNG, ADMR., BUREAU OF WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

No. 36871Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided February 23, 1961.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Workmen’s compensation — Summary judgment — Section 2311.041, Revised Code — Effect on proceeding pending prior to effective date — Statutory construction — Section 1.20, Revised Code — Applicability.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Muskingum County.

Messrs. Clayman Clayman and Mr. Leonard Sigall, for appellee.

Messrs. Zinn, Tate Cultice, for appellant Mosaic Tile Company.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, for appellant James L. Young, Admr., Bureau of Workmen’s Compensation.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TAFT, BELL and O’NEILL, JJ., concur.