2009-Ohio-1392, 904 N.E.2d 535
No. 2008-2258.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted February 17, 2009.
Decided April 1, 2009.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 07AP-680, 2008-Ohio-5261.
{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.
{¶ 2} The cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of whether the court of appeals’ judgment should be modified in view of our opinion i Martin v. Design Constr. Servs., Inc., 121 Ohio St.3d 66, 2009-Ohio-1, 902 N.E.2d 10.
MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
PFEIFER and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent and would not accept the appeal.
Fusco, Mackey, Mathews Gill, L.L.P., and Michael J. Fusco, for appellants.
Zeiger, Tigges Little, L.L.P., John W. Zeiger, Stuart G. Parsell, and Matthew S. Zeiger, for appellee.