BUOSCIO v. MANSFIELD CORR. INSTITUTION, Unpublished Decision (2-4-2003)


SAMUEL L. BUOSCIO, Plaintiff v. MANSFIELD CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendant.

Case No. 2002-09749-AD.Court of Claims of Ohio.
February 4, 2003.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CASE {¶ 1} THE COURT FINDS THAT:

{¶ 2} 1) On November 9, 2000, the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court filed a judgment entry declaring Samuel L. Buoscio, the plaintiff in the above captioned claim, a vexatious litigator pursuant to R.C. 2323.52(D)(1). The entry declaring Samuel L. Buoscio a vexatious litigator did not carry an expiration date;

{¶ 3} 2) As part of the November 9, 2000 judgment entry, Samuel L. Buoscio was barred from instituting legal proceedings in this court pursuant to R.C. 2323.52(D)(1))(b);

{¶ 4} 3) On November 1, 2002, Samuel L. Buoscio filed the instant action, Case No. 2002-09749-AD. On November 12, 2002, Samuel L. Buoscio submitted the $25.00 filing fee. Samuel L. Buoscio did not submit any leave of court granting him permission to file this claim, Case No. 2002-09749-AD, as provided in R.C. 2323.52(D)(c).

{¶ 5} IT IS ORDERED THAT:

{¶ 6} 1) Case No. 2002-09749-AD is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 2323.52(I);

{¶ 7} 2) The clerk shall return the check representing the $25.00 filing fee in Case No. 2002-09749-AD to Samuel L. Buoscio at his last known address;

{¶ 8} 3) Costs for this claim are assessed against Samuel L. Buoscio.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk