BUSHNELL v. MANZER, 138 Ohio St. 479 (1941)

35 N.E.2d 732

BUSHNELL, TRUSTEE, APPELLANT v. MANZER, EXRX., ET AL., APPELLANTS; HAMMOND ET AL., APPELLEES.

No. 28687Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided July 2, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appeal on law and fact — From Probate Court to Common Pleas Court — Governed by statutes in force when action instituted — Section 26, General Code — Section 6, Article IV, Constitution.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. Eugene L. Parker, Mr. William F. Steck and Messrs. Bushnell, Burgess Fulton, for appellants.

Mr. H.J. Crawford, Mr. Ralph M. Besse, Mr. Robert H. Jones, Messrs. Squire, Sanders Dempsey, Mr. Mark L. McCave, Messrs. Snyder, Seagrave, Roudebush Adrion, Mr. Harold Ellsworth, Mr. W.H. Hill, Mr. Sidney A. Thorman, Messrs. Bernsteen Bernsteen
and Mr. Salvadore J. Capecelatro, for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.

MATTHIAS, J., not participating.

Page 480