2007-Ohio-6140 Tenney v. Gen. Elec. Co. No. 2007-1490.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 21, 2007. Trumbull App. No. 2005-T-0119, 2007-Ohio-3367. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. III. O’CONNOR and O’DONNELL, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER and LANZINGER, […]
Category: Ohio Supreme Court Opinions
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET, 66 Ohio St.3d 1513 (1993)
614 N.E.2d 759-760Supreme Court of Ohio. 1993. MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET Wednesday, June 23, 1993 On June 18, 1993, the Supreme Court of Ohio suspended one hundred thirteen attorneys from the practice of law for noncompliance with the requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education. In addition, the Supreme Court publicly reprimanded two attorneys pursuant […]
STATE v. WHARF, 83 Ohio St.3d 1463 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 879 State v. Wharf. 98-1925.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 21, 1998 Appeal from the Warren App. No. CA97-08-087. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 12 of the court of appeals Entry Granting Motion to Certify […]
STATE v. BARKER, 119 Ohio St.3d 1473 (2008)
2008-Ohio-4911 State v. Barker. No. 2008-1042.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 1, 2008. Union App. No. 14-07-27. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
CLEVELAND v. P.U.C.O., 164 Ohio St. 442 (1956)
132 N.E.2d 216 CITY OF CLEVELAND ET AL., APPELLANTS v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. Nos. 34444 and 34445Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 25, 1956. Public Utilities Commission — Telephone companies — Rates and charges determined, how — Duties of commission in determining — Statutory rate base determined, how — Reconstruction cost new […]
MOTION DOCKET, 77 Ohio St.3d 1545 (1997)
674 N.E.2d 1182-1188Supreme Court of Ohio. 1997. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, January 29, 199795-595. State ex rel. Capitol Materials Co. v. Trimble. Franklin App. No. 94APD02-138. On motion to advance case on docket. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., also notes that the motion is moot. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent and would grant the […]
IN RE ADOPTION OF ASENTE, 87 Ohio St.3d 1480 (1999)
721 N.E.2d 408 In re Adoption of Asente. No. 99-2158.Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus County. December 23, 1999. MOTION DOCKET Trumbull Appeal from App. Nos. 99-T-0055, 99-T-0056, 99-T-0057 and 99-T-0058. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for stay of the […]
STATE v. CAPONI, 12 Ohio St.3d 302 (1984)
466 N.E.2d 551 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. CAPONI, APPELLEE. No. 83-916Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided August 1, 1984. Criminal law — Search and seizure — Search conducted with “investigatory intent” does not constitute “inventory search” and may not be used as pretext for warrantless evidentiary search, when. O.Jur 3d Criminal Law §§ 508, […]
STATE, EX REL. v. YOUNGSTOWN, 138 Ohio St. 123 (1941)
32 N.E.2d 852 THE STATE, EX REL. SERGI, A TAXPAYER, APPELLEE v. CITY OF YOUNGSTOWN, APPELLANT. No. 28520Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided March 12, 1941. Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Municipal corporations — Licensing coin-operated devices for playing games of skill — Abuse of corporate power — Section 3, […]
STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN, v. TUDHOPE, 41 Ohio St.2d 57 (1975)
322 N.E.2d 675 THE STATE, EX REL. CORRIGAN, v. TUDHOPE. No. 74-658Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 5, 1975. Municipal corporations — Vacancy on council — Votes required to fill — Majority of remaining members controls, when — Right of president of council to vote. IN QUO WARRANTO. An emergency meeting of the Berea city […]
JONOVICH v. E. CLEVELAND, 114 Ohio St.3d 1477 (2007)
2007-Ohio-3699 Jonovich v. E. Cleveland. No. 2007-1112.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 25, 2007. Appeal from the Cuyahoga App. No. 88272, 2007-Ohio-1984. Motion and Procedural Rulings. On motion for stay of order requiring the mayor of East Cleveland to immediately appoint a fire chief or acting fire chief. Motion denied. LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR and LANZINGER, JJ., […]
STATE, EX REL. HENRY, v. GROSSMANN, 5 Ohio St.3d 235 (1983)
450 N.E.2d 1156 THE STATE, EX REL. HENRY, APPELLANT, v. GROSSMANN, JUDGE, APPELLEE. No. 82-1697Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided July 6, 1983. Custody — Appellate procedure — Mandamus to compel granting of transcript at public expense for appeal of termination of parental rights — Right to transcript hinges on status as indigent — Consideration of […]
STATE EX REL. VOLKER v. INDUS. COMM., 75 Ohio St.3d 466 (1996)
663 N.E.2d 933 THE STATE EX REL. VOLKER, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 94-1504Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted March 5, 1996 — Decided May 15, 1996. Page 467 APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 93AP-968. Appellant-claimant, Paul J. Volker, was employed by appellee Rego Berea Supermarkets, Inc. […]
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET, 67 Ohio St.3d 1416 (1993)
616 N.E.2d 241-244Supreme Court of Ohio. 1993. DISCIPLINARY DOCKET Thursday, July 29, 1993 93-1418. In re Bustamante. Pursuant to the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3), John H. Bustamante of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0009679, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the state of Ohio. WRIGHT, J., not participating. 93-1459. In re […]
PENROD v. BENDOLPH, 85 Ohio St.3d 1475 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 848 Penrod v. Bendolph. No. 98-587.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 1999. MOTION DOCKET In Habeas Corpus. This cause came on for further consideration upon petitioner’s motion to clarify court order/decision. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to clarify court order/decision be, and hereby is, denied. MERIT […]
IN RE ESTATE OF FULK, 136 Ohio St. 233 (1940)
24 N.E.2d 1020 IN RE ESTATE OF FULK: FULK ET AL., APPELLANTS v. FULK, ADMR., APPELLEE. No. 27625Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided January 24, 1940. Banks and banking — Executors and administrators — Joint deposit payable to husband or wife — Omitted from inventory of wife’s estate — Parol testimony by building and loan secretary […]
IN RE APPLICATION OF COLUMBUS, 128 Ohio St.3d 512 (2011)
2011-Ohio-1788 IN RE APPLICATION OF COLUMBUS SOUTHERN POWER COMPANY ET AL.; OFFICE OF THE OHIO CONSUMERS’ COUNSEL ET AL., APPELLANTS; PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 2009-2022.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted February 2, 2011. Decided April 19, 2011. APPEAL from the Public Utilities Commission, Nos. 08-917-EL-SSO and 08-918-EL-SSO. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J. {¶ 1} This appeal […]
STATE v. GOLDSMITH, 121 Ohio St.3d 1456 (2009)
2009-Ohio-1891 State v. Goldsmith. No. 2009-0001.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 24, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 90617, 2008-Ohio-5990. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2007-1812, State v. Harris, Hamilton App. No. C-060587, 2007-Ohio-857; and briefing schedule stayed.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW, Unpublished Decision (5-11-2005)
2005-Ohio-2188 APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW. Supreme Court of Ohio. May 11, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW 2005-0180. Spivey v. Keller. Hardin App. No. 6-04-09, 2004-Ohio-6667. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2004-1492 and 2004-1647, Estate of Harrold v. Collier, Wayne […]
STATE v. BRICKNER-LATHAM, 109 Ohio St.3d 1507 (2006)
2006-Ohio-2998, 849 N.E.2d 1028 State v. Brickner-Latham. No. 2006-0605.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 21, 2006. Seneca App. No. 13-05-26, 2006-Ohio-609. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW O’DONNELL, J., dissents.
BASHAM v. BASHAM, 115 Ohio St.3d 1441 (2007)
2007-Ohio-5567 Basham v. Basham. No. 2007-1167.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 24, 2007. Scioto App. No. 06CA3085, 2007-Ohio-3941. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SWANSON v. CLEVELAND, 119 Ohio St.3d 1473 (2008)
2008-Ohio-4911 Swanson v. Cleveland. No. 2008-1063.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 1, 2008. Cuyahoga App. No. 89490, 2008-Ohio-1254. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM, 103 Ohio St.3d 1473 (2004)
2004-Ohio-5393, 815 N.E.2d 1125 CONSTELLATION NEWENERGY, INC. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM. 2003-2159.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 7, 2004. Public Utilities Commission, No. 02-2779-EL-ATA. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the motions of appellees Cincinnati Gas Electric Company and Dayton Power and […]
STATE v. HENDON, 126 Ohio St.3d 1614 (2010)
2010-Ohio-5101, 935 N.E.2d 853 State ex rel. North v. Hendon. No. 2010-1526.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 27, 2010. In Mandamus. Merit Decisions Without Opinions. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and. CUPP, JJ., concur.
DEROLPH v. STATE, 86 Ohio St.3d 1422 (1999)
711 N.E.2d 1015 DeRolph v. State. No. 99-570.Supreme Court of Ohio. Announcement Date: July 1, 1999. Perry C.P. No. 22043. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of right from the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County. Upon consideration of appellees’ motion to establish expedited briefing schedule and to dispense with […]
LIND v. STATE AUTO. INS. ASSN., 128 Ohio St. 1 (1934)
190 N.E. 138 LIND v. THE STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTUAL INS. ASSN. ET AL. No. 24207Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided March 14, 1934. Insurance — Automobile liability — Notice of accident, claim or suit — Provisions prohibiting waiver inapplicable to waiver after loss occurs, when — Waiver of proofs and notices proved by words or conduct […]
STATE v. MURPHY, 127 Ohio St.3d 1459 (2010)
2010-Ohio-6008 State v. Murphy. No. 2010-1921.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 15, 2010. Scioto App. No. 09CA3311, 2010-Ohio-5031. Motion and Procedural Rulings. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
FEATZKA v. MILLCRAFT PAPER, 62 Ohio St.2d 245 (1980)
405 N.E.2d 264 FEATZKA, APPELLANT, v. MILLCRAFT PAPER COMPANY, APPELLEE. No. 79-752Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided May 28, 1980. Labor — Wage discrimination — Recovery of sex-based wage differentials — Limitation of actions — R.C. 4111.17(E), construed. The requirement in R.C. 4111.17(E) that actions initiated under R.C. 4111.17(D) for the recovery of sex-based wage differentials […]
SEELEY v. RAHE, 16 Ohio St.3d 25 (1985)
475 N.E.2d 1271 SEELEY, APPELLANT, v. RAHE ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 84-289Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided March 27, 1985. Negligence — Comparative negligence not applicable where none of parties is negligent. O.Jur 2d Negligence § 84.5 The application by the trial court of the principles of contributory negligence in a case involving a multi-car collision, […]
EX REL. SHELLY MATERIALS, INC. v. CLARK CTY. BD., 111 Ohio St.3d 1429 (2006)
2006-Ohio-5351 State ex rel. Shelly Materials, Inc. v. Clark Cty. Bd. of Commrs. No. 2006-0165.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 18, 2006. Clark App. No. 2003-CA-72, 2005-Ohio-6682. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS On requests for oral argument. Requests granted.
STATE EX REL. WAITERS v. SZABO, 128 Ohio St.3d 1406 (2011)
2011-Ohio-846 State ex rel. Waiters v. Szabo. No. 2010-2067.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 25, 2011. Cuyahoga App. No. 94599, 2010-Ohio-5249. Mediation Referral. The following case has been referred to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Parc.R. 17.1(E):
STATE, EX REL. v. EPPLEY, 131 Ohio St. 454 (1936)
3 N.E.2d 56 THE STATE, EX REL. FERNBERG v. EPPLEY ET AL. No. 25951Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided June 17, 1936. Supreme Court — Dismissals — Moot question — Mandamus — Liquor permit revoked on answer day — Judgment for costs. IN MANDAMUS. Mr. Louis Fernberg, for relator. Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, and […]
WIGGLESWORTH v. METTLER TOLEDO INTERNATL., INC., 126 Ohio St.3d 1515 (2010)
2010-Ohio-3331 Wigglesworth v. Mettler Toledo Internatl., Inc. No. 2010-0770.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 21, 2010. Franklin App. No. 09AP-411, 2010-Ohio-1019. Appeals not Accepted for Review.
IN RE RESIGNATION OF O’NEILL, Unpublished Decision (4-7-1999)
In re Resignation of O’Neill. No. 97-2344.Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided April 7, 1999. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] On motion to withdraw as counsel. Motion granted.
STATE, EX REL. v. KAUTZ, 131 Ohio St. 103 (1936)
2 N.E.2d 1 THE STATE, EX REL. JASTER, JR., DIR. OF HIGHWAYS v. KAUTZ, JUDGE. No. 25861Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided May 6, 1936. Mandamus — Writ denied where remedy at law adequate to review erroneous judgment — Granting second new trial in same case on weight of evidence — Section 11577, General Code — […]
IN RE KLAUSMEYER, 24 Ohio St.2d 143 (1970)
265 N.E.2d 275 IN RE KLAUSMEYER ET AL. No. 70-730Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided December 16, 1970. Evidence — Attorney participating in inquiry under Rule XVIII of Supreme Court — Witness before grand jury — Must testify to matters under inquiry — Proceedings under Rule XVIII private — Habeas corpus — Writ denied, when. 1. […]
McQUEEN v. SMITH, 119 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2008)
2008-Ohio-4911 McQueen v. Smith. No. 2008-1532.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 1, 2008. In Habeas Corpus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jesse McQueen. Sua sponte, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
STATE v. EDGINGTON, 114 Ohio St.3d 1504 (2007)
2007-Ohio-4285 State v. Edgington. No. 2007-1096.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 29, 2007. Ross App. No. 05CA2866, 2006-Ohio-3712. Motion and Procedural Rulings On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied. MOYER, C.J., dissents.
CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSN. v. THOMAS, 125 Ohio St.3d 24 (2010)
2010-Ohio-1031, 925 N.E.2d 959 CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN BAR ASSOCIATION v. THOMAS. No. 2009-1961.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted December 16, 2009. Decided March 24, 2010. ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 09-007. Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Sam Thomas III of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0067848, […]
FLEISHER v. FORD MOTOR CO., 123 Ohio St.3d 1523 (2009)
2009-Ohio-6487 Fleisher v. Ford Motor Co. No. 2009-1670.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 16, 2009. Franklin App. No. 09AP-139, 2009-Ohio-3846 and 2009-Ohio-4847. Appeals not Accepted for Review. PFEIFER, J., dissents. O’CONNOR, J., not participating.
STATE v. PAMER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1559 (2005)
2005-Ohio-5531, 836 N.E.2d 583 State v. Pamer. 2005-1571.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 26, 2005. Medina App. No. 04CA0027-M, 2004-Ohio-7190. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
DISCIPLINARY CASES, Unpublished Decision (7-14-2005)
2005-Ohio-3551 Disciplinary Cases. Supreme Court of Ohio. July 14, 2005. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] DISCIPLINARY CASES 2005-1005. Disciplinary Counsel v. Anselmi. On Certified Order of the State of Michigan Attorney Discipline Board, Case No. 03-161-GA. Kurt Anthony Anselmi, Attorney Registration No. 0064192, is publicly reprimanded.
STATE v. BROWN, 83 Ohio St.3d 1431 (1998)
699 N.E.2d 946 State v. Brown. 98-1286.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 23, 1998. Stark App. No. 1997CA00363.
STATE, EX REL. v. CELEBREZZE, 141 Ohio St. 627 (1943)
49 N.E.2d 945 THE STATE, EX REL. WOLCOTT v. CELEBREZZE, DIR. No. 29349Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided June 23, 1943. Civil service — Police department — Position above rank of patrolman abolished — Incumbent to be demoted to next lower rank — Vacancies to be filled by promotion from grade or rank lower — Increase […]
STATE EX REL. HARDEN v. WILKINSON, 83 Ohio St.3d 1408 (1998)
698 N.E.2d 434 State ex rel. Harden v. Wilkinson. No. 98-1183.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 26, 1998. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. Page 1409
STATE v. ROARK, 105 Ohio St.3d 1464 (2005)
2005-Ohio-1024 State v. Roark. 2004-2061.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 16, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-030547. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
MOTION DOCKET, 41 Ohio St.3d 702 (1989)
534 N.E.2d 1201Supreme Court of Ohio. 1989. MOTION DOCKET Friday, January 13, 1989 87-1886. Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. Appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, No. 86-05-EL-EFC. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the joint motion […]
CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. ROTHERMEL, 104 Ohio St.3d 413 (2004)
2004-Ohio-6559, 819 N.E.2d 1099 CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. ROTHERMEL. No. 2004-1010.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted October 12, 2004. Decided December 15, 2004. On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 03-088. Per Curiam. {¶ 1} Respondent, Christian Dean Rothermel of Hamilton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0043140, was […]
GOINS v. PINEDA, 2010-1736 (2-9-2011)
2011-Ohio-559 Goins v. Pineda, Slip Opinion No. 2011-Ohio-529. No. 2010-1736.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 9, 2011. MERIT DECISION WITH OPINION Hocking App. No. 09CA5. Judgment of the court of appeals affirmed. O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Page 1
STATE v. PINCHBACK, 107 Ohio St.3d 1423 (2005)
2005-Ohio-6124 State v. Pinchback. 2005-1470.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 23, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 86494. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
STATE v. RAINES, 83 Ohio St.3d 1448 (1998)
700 N.E.2d 332 State v. Raines. NO. 98-1488.Supreme Court of Ohio. October 7, 1998. Hamilton App. No. C-980419. Page 1449
GEORGE v. MIRACLE SOLUTIONS, 123 Ohio St.3d 1497 (2009)
2009-Ohio-6015 George v. Miracle Solutions, Inc. No. 2009-1610.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 18, 2009. Stark App. No. 2009-CA-00088, 2009-Ohio-3659. Appeals not Accepted for Review.
STATE v. RIVERA, 107 Ohio St.3d 1681 (2005)
2005-Ohio-6480 State v. Rivera. 2005-1663.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 14, 2005. Cuyahoga App. No. 85118, 2005-Ohio-3833. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1171, State v. Mathias, Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982, and 2004-1267, State v. Fair, Cuyahoga App. No. 82278, 2004-Ohio-2971; and briefing schedule stayed. RESNICK, J., dissents.
JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED, 47 Ohio St.3d 711 (1989)
548 N.E.2d 241-245Supreme Court of Ohio. 1989. JURISDICTIONAL MOTIONS ALLOWED Wednesday, December 13, 1989 89-1648. Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical Ctr. Cuyahoga County, No. 55497. On motion Page 712 to certify record and on motion for leave to file memorandum in opposition instanter. Motions granted. 89-1662. Vogel v. Wells. Summit County, No. 13668. On motion […]
STATE v. GREEN, 127 Ohio St.3d 1503 (2011)
2011-Ohio-19, 939 N.E.2d 1266 State v. Green. No. 2010-1699.Supreme Court of Ohio. January 19, 2011. Franklin App. No. 09AP-972, 2010-Ohio-3838. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
COLLINS v. OHIO STATE UNIV., 122 Ohio St.3d 1407 (2009)
2009-Ohio-2751 Collins v. Ohio State Univ. No. 2009-0628.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 17, 2009. In Mandamus. MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac. R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur.
MCCONNAUGHY v. DOE, 174 Ohio St. 533 (1963)
190 N.E.2d 576 MCCONNAUGHY v. DOE, SUPT., LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION (MAXWELL, WARDEN, SUBSTITUTED RESPONDENT). No. 37973Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided May 15, 1963. Habeas corpus — Not available to determine questions available on appeal — Errors which do not entitle petitioner to release — Confinement for several crimes — Validity of only one conviction attacked. […]
DEROLPH v. STATE, 78 Ohio St.3d 419 (1997)
678 N.E.2d 886 DEROLPH ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. THE STATE OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 95-2066Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted April 15, 1997 — Decided April 25, 1997. ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION.[1] [1] The decision on the merits in this case may be found at 78 Ohio St.3d 193, 677 N.E.2d 733. Bricker […]
CHRYSLER CORP. v. TRACY, 73 Ohio St.3d 26 (1995)
652 N.E.2d 185 CHRYSLER CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. TRACY, TAX COMMR., APPELLEE. No. 94-380Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted April 18, 1995 — Decided August 9, 1995. APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 91-K-1523. During the natural gas shortages beginning in 1973, the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio encouraged large industrial consumers to purchase natural gas […]
CUSACK v. McGRAIN, 136 Ohio St. 27 (1939)
23 N.E.2d 633 CUSACK, APPELLEE v. McGRAIN; THE NEW YORK CASUALTY CO., APPELLANT. No. 27491Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided November 15, 1939. Suretyship — Bond of employee in Department of Liquor Control — Section 6064-6, General Code — Statutory condition for faithful performance of duties read into bond — Section 6, General Code — Person […]
STATE v. BALLARD, 117 Ohio St.3d 1439 (2008)
2008-Ohio-1279 State v. Ballard. No. 2007-2197.Supreme Court of Ohio. March 26, 2008. Hamilton App. No. C-061077. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. EMERSON, 2008-1874 (11-14-2008)
2008-Ohio-5893 Disciplinary Counsel v. Emerson. No. 2008-1874.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 14, 2008. DISCIPLINARY CASES On Certified Order of the Supreme Court of Kentucky, Case No. 2008-SC-000353-KB. Eric Lamar Emerson, Attorney Registration No. 0072916, is publicly reprimanded. Page 1
CHERRYDALE FARMS, INC. v. MYERS, 85 Ohio St.3d 1487 (1999)
709 N.E.2d 1215 CHERRYDALE FARMS, INC. v. MYERS. No. 99-519.Supreme Court of Ohio. January, 1999. APPEAL from Lucas App. No. L-97-1268.
STATE v. MILLER, 106 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1169 State v. Miller. 2005-0584.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Putnam App. No. 12-05-02. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
SIGLER v. STATE, 123 Ohio St.3d 1505 (2009)
2009-Ohio-6210 Sigler v. State. No. 2009-1058.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 2, 2009. Richland App. No. 08-CA-79, 2009-Ohio-2010. Motion and Procedural Rulings. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted. CUPP, J., dissents.
IN RE STINE, 113 Ohio St.3d 1491 (2007)
2007-Ohio-1986 In re Stine. No. 2007-0174.Supreme Court of Ohio. May 2, 2007. Hancock App. No. 5-06-11, 2006-Ohio-6687. Appeals Not Accepted for Review CUPP, J., not participating.
ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET, 84 Ohio St.3d 1477 (1998)
Supreme Court of Ohio. 1998. ADMINISTRATIVE DOCKET Thursday, January 21, 1999 1. Proposed amendments to DR 2-103 (Recommendation of Professional. Employment) and proposed Lawyer Referral and Information Services Regulations will be published for public comment. 2. Proposed amendments to DR 2-111 (Sale of Law Practice) will be published for public comment. 3. A Temporary Provision […]
STATE v. KOLVEK, 103 Ohio St.3d 1528 (2004)
2004-Ohio-5852, 817 N.E.2d 410 STATE v. KOLVEK. 2004-1368.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 10, 2004. Summit App. No. 21752, 2004-Ohio-3706.
STATE EX REL. STROTHERS v. TURNER, 79 Ohio St.3d 272 (1997)
680 N.E.2d 1238 THE STATE EX REL. STROTHERS, APPELLANT, v. TURNER, CLERK, APPELLEE. No. 97-444Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted May 20, 1997 — Decided July 23, 1997. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 71492. In June 1996, WKYC-TV in Cleveland aired an investigative report which suggested that Carmela Carter, an employee of […]
STATE v. CUMMINGS, Unpublished Decision (6-2-1999)
State v. Cummings. No. 99-553.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 2, 1999. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from Medina App. No. 2824-M. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
STATE v. PAMER, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2006)
2006-Ohio-1703 State ex rel. Pamer v. Collier, No. 2005-2201.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 12, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Medina App. No. 05CA0083-M. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
STATE v. RAINE, 121 Ohio St.3d 1451 (2009)
2009-Ohio-1820 State v. Raine. No. 2009-0110.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 22, 2009. Cuyahoga App. No. 90681, 2008-Ohio-5993. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Page 1452
STATE v. DOWNING, 122 Ohio St.3d 1451 (2009)
2009-Ohio-3161 State v. Downing. No. 2008-2009.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 30, 2009. Franklin App. No. 08AP-48, 2008-Ohio-4463. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is no […]
STATE v. LAMBERT, Unpublished Decision (2-17-1999)
State v. Lambert. No. 98-2716.Supreme Court of Ohio.Date: February 3, 1999. Announcement: February 17, 1999. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] Appeal from Montgomery App. No. 16667.
FRESHWATER v. MT. VERNON CITY BD. EDN., 123 Ohio St.3d 1404 (2009)
2009-Ohio-5031 State ex rel. Freshwater v. Mt. Vernon City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. No. 2009-1408.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 30, 2009. In Mandamus and Prohibition. Merit Decisions Without Opinions. On respondents’ answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed. MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, […]
BATES v. SCHNEIDER, 112 Ohio St.3d 1415 (2006)
State ex rel. Bates v. Schneider. 2006-1997.Supreme Court of Ohio. December 27, 2006. In Mandamus. Merit Decisions Without Opinions. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed. MOVER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and JJ., LANZINGER, JJ., concur.
STATE, EX REL. v. PHARMACY BD., 127 Ohio St. 513 (1934)
189 N.E. 447 THE STATE, EX REL. THE JOSEPH R. PEEBLES SONS CO. v. STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY ET AL. No. 24611Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided February 14, 1934. Intoxicating liquors — Liquor Control Act — Legislative intent sought from entire act, and effect given evident purpose — Wholesale distributor sells to retail dealers for […]
COADY v. LEONARD, 132 Ohio St. 329 (1937)
7 N.E.2d 649 COADY, APPELLEE v. LEONARD ET AL., BOARD OF LIQUOR CONTROL, ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 26200Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided March 24, 1937. Board of Liquor Control — Power to promulgate regulations governing advertisement of beer and intoxicating liquors — Paragraph “(f),” Section 6064-3, General Code — Administrative power conferred and legislative power […]
HE v. ZENG, 106 Ohio St.3d 1412 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3154 He v. Zeng. 2005-0379.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 29, 2005. Licking App. No. 2004CA00066, 2004-Ohio-6708. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
FOREMAN v. BANK, 119 Ohio St. 17 (1928)
162 N.E. 42 FOREMAN, ADMX. v. THE MEDINA COUNTY NATIONAL BANK ET AL. No. 20927Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided May 31, 1928. Wills — Devise or legacy lapses, and testator dies intestate as to property, when — Property coming from deceased spouse descends equally to testator’s next of kin, when — Executors and administrators — […]
IN RE PICCIANO, 118 Ohio St.3d 1513 (2008)
2008-Ohio-3441 In re Picciano. No. 2008-1049.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 10, 2008. Disciplinary Cases. On May 30, 2008, and pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(3), the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio certified to the Supreme Court a certified copy of a judgment entry of a […]
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET, 81 Ohio St.3d 1424 (1998)
689 N.E.2d 46Supreme Court of Ohio. 1998. DISCIPLINARY DOCKET Tuesday, January 27, 199897-1651. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Elsass. This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent, Tobias H. Elsass, a.k.a. Tobias Harold Elsass, on December 9, 1997, of an application for reinstatement to the practice of law. Upon consideration thereof, IT […]
STATE EX REL. CAMPBELL v. FUCITO, 106 Ohio St.3d 1461 (2005)
2005-Ohio-3490, 830 N.E.2d 1169 State ex rel. Campbell v. Fucito. 2005-0572.Supreme Court of Ohio. July 13, 2005. Hamilton App. No. C-040003. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
CNG FINANCIAL CORP. v. NADEL, Unpublished Decision (11-1-2006)
2006-Ohio-5625 State ex rel. CNG Financial Corp. v. Nadel, 2006-Ohio-5344. No. 2006-0730.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 1, 2006. [EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Hamilton App. No. C-060115. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
CLEVELAND v. STATE, 125 Ohio St.3d 1460 (2010)
2010-Ohio-2753 Cleveland v. State. No. 2009-2280.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 23, 2010. Cuyahoga App. No. 92663, 185 Ohio App.3d 59, 2009-Ohio-5968. Motion and Procedural Rulings. On motions for admission pro hac vice of James B. Vogts and Lawrence G. Keane by David W. Hardymon. Motions granted.
STATE v. DIXON, 126 Ohio St.3d 1585 (2010)
2010-Ohio-4542, 934 N.E.2d 356 State v. Dixon. No. 2010-1109.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 29, 2010. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Montgomery App. No. 23592, 2010-Ohio-2635. Discretionary appeal not accepted. Motions to review memorandum and for production of evidence denied as moot.
STATE v. SLIDER, 129 Ohio St.3d 1454 (2011)
2011-Ohio-4217, 951 N.E.2d 1049 State v. Slider. No. 2011-0020.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 24, 2011. Washington App. No. 09CA41, 2010-Ohio-5952. Reconsideration of Prior Decision. Reported at 128 Ohio St.3d 1514, 2011-Ohio-2686, 948 N.E.2d 450. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
IBM CORP. v. FRANKLIN CTY. BD. OF REV., 114 Ohio St.3d 1522 (2007)
2007-Ohio-4598 IBM Corp. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision. No. 2007-0076.Supreme Court of Ohio. September 7, 2007. Franklin App. No. 06AP-108, 2006-Ohio-5258. Miscellaneous Dismissals. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand to the Franklin County Board […]
STATE v. CONNELL, 107 Ohio St.3d 1421 (2005)
2005-Ohio-6124 State v. Connell. 2005-1434.Supreme Court of Ohio. November 23, 2005. Huron App. No. H-03-026, 2005-Ohio-3202. APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decisions in 2004-1771, State v. Quinones, Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004-Ohio-4485, and 2004-1568, State v. Foster, Licking App. No. 03CA95, 2004-Ohio-4209; and briefing schedule stayed. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., […]
STEFFEN v. COURT OF APPEALS FIRST DIST., 124 Ohio St.3d 1471 (2010)
2010-Ohio-354 State ex rel. Steffen v. Court of Appeals, First Appellate Dist. No. 2009-2166.Supreme Court of Ohio. February 10, 2010. In Prohibition. MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration thereof, It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that […]
JUREK v. MCFAUL, 39 Ohio St.3d 42 (1988)
528 N.E.2d 1260 JUREK v. MCFAUL, SHERIFF. No. 88-919Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted June 13, 1988 — Decided October 5, 1988. Habeas corpus — Denial of postconviction bail not unlawful, when — App. R. 8. IN HABEAS CORPUS. Petitioner, Frederic Jurek, states that he was convicted of three counts of bribery in Cuyahoga County involving payments […]
BOARD OF ED. v. OLENICK, 45 Ohio St.2d 300 (1976)
345 N.E.2d 66 BOARD OF EDN. OF CANFIELD LOCAL SCHOOL DIST., APPELLEE, v. OLENICK, AUDITOR OF MAHONING COUNTY, ET AL.; BD. OF TAX APPEALS, APPELLANT. No. 75-579Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided March 24, 1976. Taxation — Real estate assessment — Schoolhouse — Duties of county auditor — Properly performed, when — State Board of Education […]
STATE EX REL. MCDONALD v. MITROVICH, 2006-1975 (4-4-2007)
2007-Ohio-1258 State ex rel. McDonald v. Mitrovich. No. 2006-1975.Supreme Court of Ohio. April 4, 2007. MERIT DECISIONS WITH OPINIONS Lake App. No. 2006-L-033, 2006-Ohio-4665. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., concur.
MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS, 100 Ohio St.3d 1413 (2003)
2003-Ohio-5087, 796 N.E.2d 540Supreme Court of Ohio. 2003. MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS Case Announcements and Administrative Actions September 26, 2003 In re Report of the Commission : O R D E R on Continuing Legal Education. : This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the […]
O’STRICKER v. JIM WALTER CORP., 4 Ohio St.3d 84 (1983)
447 N.E.2d 727 O’STRICKER ET AL., CO-EXECUTORS, APPELLANTS, v. JIM WALTER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES. No. 82-403Supreme Court of Ohio. Decided April 13, 1983. Statute of limitations — Products liability — Asbestos-related bodily injury claims — Cause “arises,” when — “Discovery rule” applicable — R.C. 2305.10. O.Jur 2d Limitation of Actions §§ 56, 58, 82. […]
STATE v. McPHERSON, 118 Ohio St.3d 1463 (2008)
2008-Ohio-2823 State v. McPherson. No. 2008-0502.Supreme Court of Ohio. June 18, 2008. Licking App. No. 07CA148. APPEALS NOT ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
McCULLER v. HUDSON, 121 Ohio St.3d 168 (2009)
2009-Ohio-721, 902 N.E.2d 979 McCULLER, APPELLANT, v. HUDSON, WARDEN, APPELLEE. Page 169 No. 2008-1986.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted February 18, 2009. Decided February 24, 2009. APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Richland County, No. 08-CA-59, 2008-Ohio-4659. Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Charles […]
MOTION DOCKET, 56 Ohio St.3d 701 (1990)
564 N.E.2d 702-708Supreme Court of Ohio. 1990. MOTION DOCKET Wednesday, December 5, 1990 88-1982. State v. Moreland. Montgomery County, No. 9907. UPON CONSIDERATION of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to stay the execution of sentence in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, IT IS ORDERED by the court that […]
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOWMAN, 110 Ohio St.3d 480 (2006)
854 N.E.2d 480, 2006-Ohio-4333 DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOWMAN. No. 2006-0444.Supreme Court of Ohio.Submitted May 23, 2006. Decided August 23, 2006. ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 05-063. LUNDBERG STRATTON, J. {¶ 1} We must decide in this case how to appropriately sanction respondent, Kevin […]
GENSLEY v. EBERLIN, 110 Ohio St.3d 1474 (2006)
2006-Ohio-4474, 853 N.E.2d 313 Gensley v. Eberlin. 2006-1554.Supreme Court of Ohio. August 30, 2006. In Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Upon consideration of the petition and the return of writ, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the writ be […]