CHATTMAN v. DRC, Unpublished Decision (4-9-2003)

MARLON R. CHATTMAN Plaintiff v. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant.

No. 2002-06073-AD.Court of Claims of Ohio.
April 9, 2003.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

{¶ 1} THE COURT FINDS THAT:

{¶ 2} 1) On December 27, 2002, this court issued an order (Jr. Vol. 728, Pgs. 158-159) requiring plaintiff to submit the filing fee on or before January 8, 2003, or face dismissal of his case;

{¶ 3} 2) On January 15, 2003, defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on plaintiff’s failure to comply with this court’s order;

{¶ 4} 3) A check of the docket reveals plaintiff has failed to submit the filing fee.

{¶ 5} IT IS ORDERED THAT:

{¶ 6} “1) Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED;

{¶ 7} 2) Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice;

{¶ 8} 3) The court shall absorb the court costs of this case.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT Deputy Clerk

Marlon A. Chattman, Pro se.

Jams R. Guy, Staff Counsel, For Defendant, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.