CICCO v. STOCKMASTER, 85 Ohio St.3d 1467 (1999)

709 N.E.2d 172

CICCO v. STOCKMASTER.

No. 99-85.Supreme Court of Ohio.
April 28, 1999

APPEAL from Huron App. No. H-98-016.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Propositions of Law Nos. I and II.

DOUGLAS, BRYANT and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., would allow all propositions of law.

MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent.

PEGGY BRYANT, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J.