CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BAILEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1402 (2006)


2006-Ohio-82, 842 N.E.2d 537

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey.

2005-1930.Supreme Court of Ohio.
January 12, 2006.

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

On December 30, 2005, respondent filed a motion for leave to file a reply brief to relator’s answer brief. Whereas there are no provisions in Gov.Bar R. VII for filing a reply brief,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to file a reply brief is denied.