CINCINNATI BAR ASSN. v. BAILEY, 108 Ohio St.3d 1468 (2006)


2006-Ohio-689, 842 N.E.2d 1049

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Bailey.

2005-1930.Supreme Court of Ohio.
February 17, 2006.

Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law; No. UPL 0313.

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

This cause is pending before the court as an unauthorized practice of law case. Upon consideration of respondent’s emergency motion for a ninety day continuance of oral argument scheduled for Tuesday, February 21, 2006, and respondent’s motion to strike relator’s memorandum in opposition to the emergency motion for a ninety day continuance of oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are denied.