156 N.E. 143
Nos. 19407 and 19516Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 8, 1926.
Workmen’s compensation — Failure to comply with specific requirement, and additional award — Jurisdiction of Industrial Commission — Decision final upon questions of fact but not of law — Remedy of employer to review granting additional award — Error proceedings do not lie to supreme court — Employer may contest legal questions when sued for award.
ERROR to the Industrial Commission.
Messrs. Baker, Hostetler Sidlo, and Mr. J.R. Kistner, for plaintiff in error in No. 19407.
Mr. W.F. Miller and Mr. H. Henry Miller, for plaintiff in error in No. 19516.
Mr. C.C. Crabbe, attorney general, and Mr. R.R. Zurmehly, for defendant in error.
It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed upon authority o Slatmeyer v. Industrial Commission, this day decided, ante, 654, 155 N.E. 484.
Petition in error dismissed.
JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and KINKADE, JJ., concur.
MARSHALL, C.J., dissents.
Page 705