63 N.E.2d 679

DEERING, APPELLANT v. HIRSCH ET AL., APPELLEES.[*]

No. 30415Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 10, 1945.

[*] Reporter’s Note: This case is pending, a motion to certify the record having been allowed.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Civil service — Director of recreation of Cincinnati — Appointed in classified service after competitive examination — City recreation commission transferred position to unclassified service and dismissed director — Due process — Inviolability of property — Impairment of contract — Section 486-17a, General Code — Sections 16 and 19, Article I, Sections 28 and 38, Article II, and Section 10, Article XV, Constitution — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Action by director against recreation commission to enjoin dismissal.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Messrs. Paxton Seasongood, for appellant.

Mr. John D. Ellis, city solicitor, and Mr. Nathan Solinger, for appellees.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, BELL, TURNER and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

Page 25

Tagged: