DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. COTTON, 106 Ohio St.3d 1420 (2005)

2005-Ohio-3322

2004-1130.Supreme Court of Ohio.
June 30, 2005.

On July 13, 2004, the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law filed a final report with this court recommending the court find that respondent has engaged in the unauthorized practice of law and prohibiting him from engaging in the unauthorized practice of law in the future. Respondent filed objections to the report, relator filed an answer to respondent’s objections, and the matter was considered by the court. Upon consideration thereof,

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law for further consideration, including findings on whether reasonable alternatives now exist in the Ohio prison system to assist inmates in the preparation of petitions for post-conviction relief as described in Johnson v. Avery
(1969), 393 U.S. 483, 89 S.Ct. 747, 21 L.Ed.2d 718.