DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. KELLER, 111 Ohio St.3d 1472 (2006)

2006-Ohio-5625

Disciplinary Counsel v. Keller.

2006-0437.Supreme Court of Ohio.
November 1, 2006.

Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 05-018.

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS
Reported at 110 Ohio St.3d 240,

Page 1473

2006-Ohio-4354, 852 N.E.2d 1195. On motion for reconsideration. The motion for reconsideration is granted to the following extent:

The opinion announced on September 6, 2006, is clarified as follows:

¶ 14 is modified to read as follows:

{¶ 14} Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with 18 months stayed, provided that respondent (1) commit no further misconduct during the two-year suspension period, and (2) continue to comply with his OLAP contract. If respondent fails to comply with either of these conditions, the stay will be lifted, and respondent will serve the full two year suspension. We further require that respondent make restitution in the amount of $102,800, with interest at the judgment rate, to Ann Thompson, or provide evidence that such obligation has been satisfied by settlement for less than the full amount, before he may apply to be reinstated to the practice of law. Costs are taxed to respondent.