DISCIPLINARY DOCKETSupreme Court of Ohio.
ANNOUNCEMENT MONDAY January 24, 2000
[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
99-1957. Disciplinary Counsel v. Zingarelli.
Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to consolidate this case with Supreme Court case No. 97-1753, Disciplinary Counsel v. Zingarelli, respondent’s motion to extend time for oral argument; and respondent’s motion to participate in oral argument pro se,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to consolidate and motion to extend time for oral argument be, and hereby are, denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument pro se be, and hereby is, granted.