DISCIPLINARY DOCKETSupreme Court of Ohio.
Announcement Wednesday April 11, 2001
96-2372. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Brown.
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by respondent of a motion to release bond. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion be, and hereby is, granted.
99-1162. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Nigolian.
On October 27, 1999, this court suspended respondent, N. Stephen Nigolian, a.k.a. Nigol Stephen Nigolian, from the practice of law for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions. On January 9, 2001, relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, filed a motion for an order to appear and show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt. On February 15, 2001, this court granted the motion and ordered respondent to file a written response to the motion. On March 6, 2001, respondent filed a response to the show cause order. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that compliance has been shown and the show cause proceedings are hereby dismissed.
00-1547. In re Mudrick.
On January 25, 2001, this court suspended respondent, Robert S. Mudrick, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5) and referred the matter to the office of Disciplinary Counsel for investigation and commencement of disciplinary proceedings. On March 28, 2001, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a notice to the court. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, sua sponte, that this matter be referred to the Akron Bar Association for investigation and commencement of disciplinary proceedings.
00-1660. In re Resignation of Noble.
On affidavit of resignation from practice of law of Ford L. Noble and report filed under seal by Disciplinary Counsel.
The resignation of Ford L. Noble as an attorney is accepted with designation “disciplinary action pending.”