645 N.E.2d 1254-1260Supreme Court of Ohio.
1995.
DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED Wednesday, March 1, 1995 94-2284. Redman v. Ohio Dept. of Indus. Relations, Ohio Div. of Mines. Franklin County, Nos. 93APE12-1670 and 93APE12-1671. The discretionary appeal is allowed on Propositions of Law II and IV only.
DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., would also allow the other propositions of law.
WRIGHT and RESNICK, JJ., dissent and would not allow the discretionary appeal.
94-2462. State v. Waddell. Franklin County, No. 94APA03-328. The discretionary appeal is allowed on Proposition of Law No. III only.
WRIGHT, J., would also allow the other propositions of law.
COOK, J., would not allow the discretionary appeal.
94-2488. Harvey v. Shoup. Portage County, No. 93-P-0118. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 94-811, Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School Dist., Medina County, No. 2258-M; briefing schedule stayed.
WRIGHT, J., dissents.
94-2515. Foster v. Cleveland Hts./Univ. Hts. Bd. of Edn Cuyahoga County, No. 66852. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 94-811, Adamsky v. Buckeye Local School Dist., Medina County, No. 2258-M; briefing schedule stayed.