662 N.E.2d 23Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED Wednesday, March 27, 1996 95-2468. State v. Weber. Franklin County, Nos. 95APC05-534, 95APC05-545 and 95APC06-717. On motion to consolidate case with 95-1377 and 95-1466, State v. Gustafson, Mahoning County, No. 94 C.A. 232. Sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466; briefing schedule stayed.
STRATTON, J., not participating.

95-2495. Asbury Apts. v. Dayton Bd. of Zoning Appeals Montgomery County, No. 15109.

RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

95-2497. Jones v. Hartranft. Franklin County, No. 95APE02-139.

RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent.

95-2647. State v. Thompkins. Hamilton County, No. C-940513. On motions for discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal allowed.

Page 1425

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

STRATTON, J., not participating.

96-210. State v. McGee. Logan County, No. 8-94-38. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only.

PFEIFER, J., would allow all propositions of law.

DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

Tagged: