663 N.E.2d 533, 5411305Supreme Court of Ohio.
1996.

DISCRETIONARY APPEALS ALLOWED Wednesday, May 15, 1996 95-2657. Bucyrus v. Fritz. Crawford County, No. 39520. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II only sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466 supra; briefing schedule stayed. 95-2668. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gula. Summit County, No. 17221. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for decision in 94-2569, Cole v. Holland, Summit County, No. 16703; briefing schedule stayed.

95-2677. Columbus v. Grove. Franklin County, No. 95APC06-679. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-372, State v. Dick, Tuscarawas County, No. 94AP040025; briefing schedule stayed.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. III; sua sponte, cause held for decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, supra;
briefing schedule stayed.

96-2. Thomas v. Freeman. Summit County, No. 17247.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK and COOK, JJ., dissent.

96-66. Columbus v. Brown. Franklin County, No. 95APC08-993. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, supra; briefing schedule stayed.

96-67. State v. Gordon. Franklin County, No. 95APC08-1098. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, supra; briefing schedule stayed.

96-69. Columbus v. Lambros. Franklin County, No. 95APC06-704. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, supra; briefing schedule stayed.

96-108. Perez v. Cleveland. Hamilton County, No. C-940553.

F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., dissent.

Page 1488

96-116. State v. Reyna. Franklin County, No. 95APC06-706. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause held for the decision in 95-1377 and 95-1466, supra; briefing schedule stayed.

96-764. Holt v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co. Butler County, No. CA95-11-192. Discretionary appeal allowed; sua sponte, cause consolidated with 96-852, supra.

RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.

Tagged: