DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, 88 Ohio St.3d 1411 (2000)

723 N.E.2d 117Supreme Court of Ohio.
2000.

DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION ANDDISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED99-1970. State v. Sparling.
Marion App. No. 9-99-25.

99-1971. In re Dissolution of Marriage of Weber.
Geauga App. No. 99-G-2217.

99-1976. Ashiegbu v. Anaba.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1637.

99-1982. State v. Tonne.
Hamilton App. No. C-980710.

RESNICK, J., dissents.

99-1994. Sethi v. WFMJ Television, Inc.
Mahoning App. No. 97CA232.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

99-1998. State v. Shaw.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1338.

99-1999. State v. Smith.
Trumbull App. Nos. 98-T-0097 and 98-T-0098.

99-2004. State v. Smith.
Hamilton App. No. C-990058.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decision in 98-2301, State v. Gowdy, Hamilton App. No. C-970359.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. II and III and hold the cause for the decision in 99-764 State v. Worthy, Portage App. No. 97-P-0059.

99-2008. State v. Wilson.
Hamilton App. No. C-990061.

MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., would allow on Proposition of Law No. II and hold the cause for the decision in 98-2301, State v. Gowdy, Hamilton App. No. C-970359.

LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. II and III and hold the cause for the decision in 99-764 State v. Worthy, Portage App. No. 97-P-0059.

99-2016. State v. Hudach.
Trumbull App. No. 98-T-0071.

99-2017. State v. Mills.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1273.

99-2019. Rose v. Rose.
Morrow App. No. CA870.

MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

99-2020. Dupuy v. Ohio Bur. of Emp. Serv.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1376.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

99-2023. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co. v. Ohio Bur. ofWorkers’ Comp.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1153.

99-2025. In re Special Grand Jury Investigation of Workers’Comp. Fraud.
Franklin App. No. 98AP-1362.

MOYER, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissent.

Page 1412