DORSEY v. GRAFTON CORR. INSTITUTION, Unpublished Decision (6-18-2003)

DARYL DORSEY, Plaintiff v. GRAFTON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendant.

Case No. 2002-02329.Court of Claims of Ohio.
June 18, 2003.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY
Judge Fred J. Shoemaker

{¶ 1} This case was tried to a magistrate of the court. On March 17, 2003, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{¶ 2} Civ.R. 53 states: “Within 14 days of the filing of a magistrate’s decision, a party may file written objections to the magistrate’s decision.” Plaintiff has not filed an objection.

{¶ 3} Upon review of the record and the magistrate’s decision, the court determines that there is no error of law or other defect on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

Daryl Dorsey, Plaintiff, Pro se.

Stephanie D. Pestello-Sharf, Patrick J. Piccininni, Assistant Attorneys General, Attorneys for Defendant.