EASLEY v. DEPT. OF REHABILITATION CORRECTION, 2010-01221 (7-25-2011)


2011-Ohio-4849

Andre Easley, Plaintiff, v. Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Defendant.

No. 2010-01221.Court of Claims of Ohio.
Filed July 25, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY {¶ 1} On May 16, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{¶ 2} Civ. R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ. R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.

{¶ 3} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

Page 2

cc:

Douglas R. Folkert Emily M. Simmons Assistant Attorneys General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130

Richard F. Swope 6480 East Main Street, Suite 102 Reynoldsburg, Ohio 43068

Page 1