FELTON v. LONDON CORRECTIONAL INST., 2008-06211 (5-31-2011)


2011-Ohio-2834

Arthur Felton, Plaintiff, v. London Correctional Institution, Defendant.

No. 2008-06211.Court of Claims of Ohio.
May 31, 2011.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

JUDGMENT ENTRY
JOSEPH T. CLARK Judge.

{¶ 1} This case is sua sponte assigned to Judge Joseph T. Clark to conduct all proceedings necessary for decision in this matter.

{¶ 2} On May 11, 2011, the magistrate issued a decision recommending judgment for defendant.

{¶ 3} Civ. R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i) states, in part: “A party may file written objections to a magistrate’s decision within fourteen days of the filing of the decision, whether or not the court has adopted the decision during that fourteen-day period as permitted by Civ. R. 53(D)(4)(e)(i).” No objections were filed.

{¶ 4} The court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on the face of the magistrate’s decision. Therefore, the court adopts the magistrate’s decision and recommendation as its own, including findings of fact and conclusions of law contained therein. Judgment is rendered in favor of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff. The clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.

Page 2

cc:

Stephanie D. Pestello-Sharf Assistant Attorney General 150 East Gay Street, 18th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-3130

Arthur Felton

123 South Huron Drive Oxon Hill, Maryland 20745

Page 1