FUTRELL v. DEPT. OF REHAB. CORR., Unpublished Decision (11-22-2002)


FREDERICK FUTRELL, Plaintiff v. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant.

Case No. 2002-05638-AD.Court of Claims of Ohio.
November 22, 2002.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Gregory C. Trout, Chief Counsel, for defendant.

MEMORANDUM DECISION {¶ 1} THE COURT FINDS THAT:

{¶ 2} 1) On June 7, 2002, plaintiff, Frederick Futrell, filed a complaint against defendant, Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, alleging his cassette tapes and cigarettes were lost while under the control of defendant’s personnel. Plaintiff seeks damages in the amount of $77.11 for property loss, plus $25.00 for filing fee reimbursement. Plaintiff submitted the filing fee on July 25, 2002;

{¶ 3} 2) On September 24, 2002, defendant filed an investigation report admitting liability and acknowledging plaintiff suffered damages in the amount of $102.11;

{¶ 4} 3) Plaintiff filed a response.

{¶ 5} THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT:

{¶ 6} 1) I find, by a preponderance of the evidence, negligence by defendant has been shown. Baisden v. Southern Ohio Correctional Facility
(1977), 76-0617-AD; Stewart v. Ohio National Guard (1979), 78-0342-AD;

{¶ 7} 2) Plaintiff has suffered damages in the amount of $77.11, plus the $25.00 filing fee, which may be reimbursed as compensable damages pursuant to the holding in Bailey v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (1990), 62 Ohio Misc.2d 19.

{¶ 8} Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and adopting the memorandum decision concurrently herewith;

{¶ 9} IT IS ORDERED THAT:

{¶ 10} 1) Plaintiff’s claim is GRANTED and judgment is rendered in favor of the plaintiff;

{¶ 11} 2) Defendant (Department of Rehabilitation and Correction) pay plaintiff (Frederick Futrell) $102.11 and such interest as is allowed by law;

{¶ 12} 3) Court costs are assessed against defendant.

DANIEL R. BORCHERT

Deputy Clerk