699 N.E.2d 94
98-1077.Supreme Court of Ohio.
September 9, 1998
Appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 96-S-438 and 96-S-439.
Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1405, 698 N.E.2d 58, This cause came on for further consideration upon appellants motion for reconsideration. Upon consideration thereof
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, granted, and the appeal is reinstated for the limited purpose of considering the parties joint motion for remand to the Board of Tax Appeals.
Page 1422
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…