2007-Ohio-6801
No. 2007-1411.Supreme Court of Ohio.
December 19, 2007.
In Mandamus.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent Jones’s motion for stay of discovery and motion to dismiss or for judgment on the pleadings,
It is ordered by the court that the motions are denied.
MOYEH, C.J., concurs with denial of the motion to dismiss but would grant the motion to stay.
LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., would grant the motion to stay and await relator’s response to the motion to dismiss.
O’DONNELL, J., would await relator’s response to the motions.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…