151 N.E.2d 561
No. 35595Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 11, 1958.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Negligence action — Appeal — Bill of exceptions — Stricken from files by Court of Appeals — Time for filing — Section 2321.05, Revised Code — Effect of amendment on pending actions — Claimed waiver of right to object to late filing — Objection after case heard by Court of Appeals — Duty owed pedestrian by railroad.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Messrs. Rager Forrester, for appellant.
Messrs. Hornbeck, Ritter Victory and Mr. Edwin S. Knachel, for appellee.
Page 164
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL and HERBERT, JJ., concur.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…