2004-Ohio-6675, 819 N.E.2d 298

Goodman, Weiss, Miller, LLP v. Boyle.

No. 2004-1691.Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided December 14, 2004.

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On consideration of the motion of Environmental Network Corporation, Environmental Network and Management Corporation, and John J. Wetterich (“ENC”) to intervene,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to intervene be, and hereby is, granted.

On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination and consideration of the motions to dismiss of respondents Wright and ENC,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions to dismiss be, and hereby are, granted and that the remaining pending motions of ENC be, and hereby are, dismissed as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that dismissal of this cause does not constitute a decision by the court on the ethical propriety of the underlying conduct.

F.E. SWEENEY, Acting C.J., GWIN, PFEIFER, CORRIGAN, O’CONNOR and CALABRESE, JJ., concur.

BOWMAN, J., concurs but would overrule the motion to intervene.

W. SCOTT GWIN, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for MOYER, C.J.

DONNA BOWMAN, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J.

MICHAEL J. CORRIGAN, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for O’DONNELL, J.