146 N.E.2d 306

IN RE ARRINGTON.

No. 35263Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 30, 1957.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Habeas corpus — Petitioner held on warrant of extradition — Section 2963.07, Revised Code — Warrant for arrest — Statutory construction — Hearing by executive secretary of Governor — Affidavit that petitioner a fugitive from justice — Validity — Sections 2963.03 and 2963.11, Revised Code — Articles V and XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Messrs. Whitmer, McGinness Zimmerman, for petitioner-appellant, Joseph J. Arrington.

Mr. John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Mrs. Gertrude Bauer Mahon, for respondent-appellee, Joseph M. Sweeney, sheriff.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

Page 83

Tagged: