2006-Ohio-2466, 847 N.E.2d 1225
2006-0613.Supreme Court of Ohio.
May 24, 2006.
Fairfield App. Nos. 2005-CA-65 and 2005-CA-66, 2006-Ohio-631.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III and cause consolidated with 2006-0614, In re Walters, Fairfield App. Nos. 2005-CA-65 and 2005-CA-66, 2006-Ohio-631.
PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law.
O’DONNELL, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II only.
RESNICK and LANZINGER, JJ., dissent.
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…