162 N.E.2d 124
No. 36092Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 7, 1959.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Purchase of manufactured “shampoo” from independent retailer — Claim purchaser injured by use of product — Claim breach of warranty — Liability of manufacturer — Evidence.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Mr. Anthony R. Fiorette and Mr. John A. Pasquale, for appellant.
Messrs. Arter, Hadden, Wykoff Van Duzer and Mr. James H. Wilkinson, for appellee.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.
Page 49