KLEIN v. MUMFORD, 127 Ohio St. 275 (1933)

188 N.E. 10

KLEIN v. MUMFORD.

No. 24111Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 11, 1933.

Supreme Court — Affirmances — Only question of fact presented.

ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Mr. William E. Minshall and Messrs. Klein Diehm, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Samuel Goldstein and Messrs. Rocker Schwartz, for defendant in error.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the Judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby affirmed, for the reason that the record presents only a question of fact.

Judgment affirmed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ALLEN, STEPHENSON, JONES, BEVIS and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Page 276

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 188 N.E. 10

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago