38 N.E.2d 411
Nos. 28839 and 28840Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided December 24, 1941.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Board of Liquor Control — Regulation of size of containers for state of beer and malt — Section 6064-8, paragraph 1(e), General Code — Amended Regulation No. 5, Board of Liquor Control — Delegation of legislative power — Section 1, Article II, Constitution — Arbitrary exercise of state police power — Interstate commerce and repeal of prohibition — section 8, Article I, and Article XXI, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEALS from the Court of Appeals of Franklin county.
Messrs. Ballard Dresbach and Messrs. Race, Haass, Allen Brewer, for appellants.
Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, Mr. David M. Spriggs
and Mr. Arthur W. Galloway, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and BETTMAN, JJ., concur.
Page 172
53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…
McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…
[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…
[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…
March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…