146 N.E.2d 301
No. 35262Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided October 30, 1957.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Lien attached to equitable interest of judgment debtor — Finding that judgment for “support and maintenance” — Dischargeability in bankruptcy — Bill of exceptions — Jurisdiction of reviewing court to consider — Issues before Court of Appeals — Articles V and XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution — Due process.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Messrs. Beach Warner, for plaintiff appellee.
Mr. E.H. Hauenstein, for appellant.
Mr. Albert D. Nesbitt, for appellee Daisy Wandrie.
Mr. W.P. Newton, for appellees Benjamin, Hazel and Robert Branson.
Per Curiam.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL, TAFT, MATTHIAS and HERBERT, JJ., concur.
Page 90