38 N.E.2d 392

KUDYSH, APPELLANT v. OHIO STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY, APPELLEE.

No. 28889Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided December 31, 1941.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — State Board of Optometry — License suspended for three years, but suspension postponed — Former order revoked and license suspended — Appeal, perfected within 15 days from last order, dismissed — Sections 1295-31a and 2461, General Code — Due process.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.

Page 152

Mr. Howell Leuck and Mr. Bingham W. Zellmer, for appellant.

Mr. Thomas J. Herbert, attorney general, and Mr. Howard Bernstein, for appellee.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, HART and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.

Tagged: