2006-Ohio-5083

Marshall v. Russo.

No. 2006-1460.Supreme Court of Ohio.
October 4, 2006.

In Prohibition.

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS
On respondent’s motions to dismiss and for sanctions for frivolous action, respondent’s motions for issuance of an alternative writ and for injunctive relief, respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motions opposing motion to dismiss, for issuance of an alternative writ, and for injunctive relief, relator’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and relator’s motion for issuance of an emergency peremptory writ. Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for sanctions granted. Motions for issuance of an alternative writ, for injunctive relief, for leave to file an amended complaint, and for issuance of an emergency peremptory writ denied. Motion to strike denied as moot. Cause dismissed.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR, O’DONNELL and LANZINGER, JJ., concur.

Tagged: