2 N.E.2d 828
Nos. 25585, 25586 and 25587Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided June 3, 1936.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Corporations — Practice of profession — Section 8623-3, General Code — Optometry — Sections 1295-21 to 1295-36, General Code — Injunction — Due process — Equal protection.
ERROR to the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county.
Messrs. Mooney, Hahn, Loeser Keough, for plaintiff in error in causes Nos. 25585 and 25586.
Page 332
Messrs. Walpaw Walpaw, for plaintiff in error in cause No. 25587.
Mr. Jack B. Dworken and Mr. Harry L. Lodish, for defendant in error.
It is ordered and adjudged that said petitions in error be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said causes.
Petitions in error dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.