MEAD JOHNSON v. COLUMBUS VITAMIN, 174 Ohio St. 408 (1963)

189 N.E.2d 635

MEAD JOHNSON CO., APPELLEE v. COLUMBUS VITAMIN COSMETIC DISTRIBUTORS, INC., APPELLANT.

No. 37799Supreme Court of Ohio.
Decided March 27, 1963.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appeal — Claimed conflict — Jurisdiction.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

Messrs. Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, Mr. James A. Gorrell an Mr. Herbert R. Brown, for appellee.

Messrs. Lane, Krotinger Santora and Mr. Max I. Ziskind, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O’NEILL, GRIFFITH and HERBERT, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD. v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., 53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)

53 N.E.3d 818 (2015)2015-Ohio-5019 CUSPIDE PROPERTIES, LTD., Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. EARL MECHANICAL SERVICES, Inc., Appellant/Cross-Appellee v.…

2 years ago

McCAMMON v. COOPER, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904)

McCammon v. Cooper, 69 Ohio St. 366 (1904) Jan. 5, 1904 · Supreme Court of Ohio · No. 8237…

5 years ago

BANK OF AM., N.A. v. SMITH, 2018-Ohio-3638

[Cite as Bank of Am., N.A. v. Smith, 2018-Ohio-3638.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST…

7 years ago

STATE v. MARCUM, 2018-Ohio-1009 (2018)

[Cite as State v. Marcum, 2018-Ohio-1009.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF…

8 years ago

In re A.F., 2018-Ohio-310 (Oh. App. 1/26/2018)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY IN RE: :…

8 years ago

Ohio Attorney General Opinion No. 2017-007

March 13, 2017 The Honorable Paul J. Gains Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney 6th Floor Administration…

8 years ago