652 N.E.2d 794-802Supreme Court of Ohio.
1995.
MERIT DOCKET Wednesday, August 2, 1995 95-772. Porter v. Ohio Parole Bd. In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-922. Cincinnati Bell Tel. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm. In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY and COOK, JJ., concur.
WRIGHT, RESNICK and PFEIFER, JJ., dissent and would deny the writs.
95-1094. Kilgour v. Edwards. In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1121. State ex rel. White v. Mengel. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
DOUGLAS, J., not participating.
95-1176. State ex rel. Wise v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1180. State ex rel. Spratz v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1182. State ex rel. McLoughlin v. Nichols. In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment and on answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., would grant the motion for summary judgment.
Page 1423
95-1187. State ex rel. Sibley v. Spicer. In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1228. State ex rel. Mercer v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1235. Huff v. Wilkinson. In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1313. Holmes v. State. On motion for declaratory judgment Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1362. Brown v. Rogers. In Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1408. In re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.
MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.
95-1490. State ex rel. Savage v. Millard. In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for emergency issuance of peremptory writ,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, effective August 1, 1995.
DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and COOK, JJ., concur.
MOYER, C.J., F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., would deny the motion.